Health professionals working with First Nations, Inuit, and Métis consensus guideline.
General
Guideline Title
Health professionals working with First Nations, Inuit, and Métis consensus guideline.
Bibliographic Source(s)
- Wilson D, de la Ronde S, Brascoupé S, Apale AN, Barney L, Guthrie B, Harrold E, Horn O, Johnson R, Rattray D, Robinson N. Health professionals working with First Nations, Inuit, and Métis consensus guideline. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2013 Jun;35(6 eSuppl):S1-52. [129 references]
Guideline Status
This is the current release of the guideline.
Recommendations
Major Recommendations
The grades of recommendations ( A-E and L ) and quality of evidence ( I, II-1, II-2, II-3, and III ) are defined at the end of the “Major Recommendations” field.
Definitions
Recommendations
- Health professionals should have an understanding of the terms by which First Nations, Inuit, and Métis identify themselves. ( III-A )
- Health professionals should have an understanding of the terms “cultural awareness,” “cultural competence,” “cultural safety,” and “cultural humility.” Health professionals should recognize that First Nations, Inuit, and Métis may have different perspectives about what culturally safe care is and should seek guidance on community-specific values. ( III-A )
Demographics
Summary Statement
- Demographically, First Nations, Inuit, and Métis peoples are younger and more mobile than non-Aboriginal people. This requires extra effort on the part of health care professionals to establish an environment of trust and cultural safety in their workplaces as the opportunity to provide care may be brief. ( III )
Recommendations
- Health professionals should be aware of the limitations of statistics collected with respect to First Nations, Inuit, and Métis and should avoid making generalizations about mortality and morbidity risks when comparing First Nations, Inuit, and Métis with one another and with non-Aboriginal populations. ( III-A )
- Health professionals who wish to conduct research with First Nations, Inuit, and Métis must use recognized ethical frameworks that include the OCAP (ownership, control, access, and possession) principles, the Tri-Council Policy Statement, and community-specific guidelines. ( II-2A )
Social Determinants of Health Among First Nations, Inuit, and Métis
Summary Statements
- Canada ranks 6th in the world on the World Health Organization Human Development Index; however, the First Nations rank 68th. ( II-3 )
- There have been centuries of formal agreements between European governments and First Nations. They were initially conducted in the spirit of friendship and cooperation, but later became centred on land ownership and resource extraction. Since they have been repeatedly dishonoured, there is an environment of mistrust in First Nations towards governments, their representatives, their policies, and anyone perceived to have authority. ( III )
- The Indian Act and its subsequent amendments were designed to control every aspect of a Status Indian’s life and to promote assimilation. It was also a tool that the government used to access First Nations’ land and resources. ( III )
- The intergenerational trauma experienced by First Nations, Inuit, and Métis is the product of colonialization. Residential schools, forced relocation, involuntary sterilization, forced adoption, religious conversion, and enfranchisement are a few examples of government policy towards First Nations, Inuit, and Métis that have created intergenerational posttraumatic stress and dysfunction. However, they continue to be a resilient people. ( III )
- Most Canadians are unaware that a large proportion of Canada’s gross domestic product is funded by monies garnished from natural resources extracted from Aboriginal lands, while First Nations and Inuit communities rely on insufficient money transfers from the Federal government. ( III )
- Multinational companies extract resources from lands that are often on or adjacent to Aboriginal communities, or lands that are under land claims negotiations. The management of lands and resources by the provinces in some regions and by the territorial and federal governments in other regions has made it difficult for First Nations Inuit and Métis communities to communicate with multinational corporations, especially where land claim negotiations are ongoing or nonexistent. Multinational corporations do not provide revenues to these communities. Most Aboriginal communities are impoverished without adequate public health infrastructure, and without economic capital to improve their condition. ( III )
- Jurisdictional issues today make it difficult to provide health care, take care of the land, and promote healthy communities. ( III )
- Eating traditional country foods helps to preserve cultural identity, but increasing environmental contaminants such as lead, arsenic, mercury, and persistent organic pollutants may compromise food safety. ( II-3 )
- Given demographic shifts such as rapidly growing populations with large youth cohorts and the increasing urbanization of First Nations, Inuit, and Métis in Canada, it is an important reality that most clinicians will encounter First Nations, Inuit, and Métis in their practice. ( II-3 )
- Traditionally, men and women in First Nations, Inuit, and Métis cultures enjoyed equal and complimentary roles. Colonialization generally led to First Nations and Inuit women being objectified, disrespected, and ignored. Through specific pieces of legislation, First Nations women in particular lost their voices and powers within their communities, including their role in promoting traditional health and education. ( III )
- The unemployment rate is much higher in Aboriginal communities than in those of non-Aboriginal Canadians. This is a major contributor to the gaps in socioeconomic status and access to equitable and quality health care. ( II-3 )
- The language of health outcome measurement often perpetuates negative stereotypes towards First Nations, Inuit, and Métis because outcomes are reported out of the context of the social, political, and economic circumstances. ( III )
Recommendation
- Health professionals should recognize the intergenerational impact of residential schools as one of the root causes of the health and social inequities among First Nations, Inuit, and Métis, with important implications for their experiences and practices surrounding pregnancy and parenting. ( II-3A )
- Health professionals should be aware that the discourse on health care policy and land claim negotiations often perpetuates negative stereotypes and often occurs without accurate reference to colonialization. ( III-L )
Clinical Tips |
---|
|
Health Systems, Policies, and Services for First Nations, Inuit, and Métis
Summary Statement
- Jurisdictional conflicts between federal, provincial, territorial, and band governments make it difficult to provide comprehensive public health and health services to First Nations. ( III )
Recommendations
- Health professionals should be aware of ongoing debates regarding jurisdictional responsibilities that impede access to good quality, timely, and culturally safe health care for First Nations and Inuit, and of Jordan’s Principle. Jordan’s Principle calls on the government agency of first contact to ensure that children get necessary and timely care by paying for services immediately and seeking reimbursement from the appropriate agency later. ( III-A )
- Health professionals who provide care to First Nations and Inuit should be aware of the Non-Insured Health Benefits program, its eligibility and coverage requirements, and the exceptions and special permissions needed in some cases. Health professionals should recognize that they have a vital role in advocating for their First Nations and Inuit patients and assisting with obtaining these benefits. Health professionals should be aware that Métis do not have access to Non-Insured Health Benefits and may face unique challenges accessing health care. ( III-A )
- All health professionals should acknowledge and respect the role that Aboriginal and Traditional midwives have in promoting the sexual and reproductive health of women and should be aware that this role is not limited to pregnancy and delivery, but often extends beyond the birth year. ( II-2A )
- Health professionals should inquire about their patients’ use of traditional medicines and practices as part of routine health practices, including prenatal care. ( III-A )
- Health professionals should be aware that each First Nations, Inuit, and Métis community has its own traditions, values, and communication practices and should engage with the community in order to become familiar with these. ( III-A )
Clinical Tips |
---|
|
First Nations, Inuit, and Métis Women’s Sexual and Reproductive Health
Summary Statement
- The harmony of First Nations, Inuit, and Métis societies was disrupted by European colonialization at the end of the 18th century, causing widespread effects on the sexual health of First Nations, Inuit, and Métis women and men. ( III )
Recommendations
- Health professionals should be aware of Canadian Criminal Code laws governing sexual activities in minors, including those under age 12, those between 12 and 16 years old, and those with a much older partner. ( III-A )
- Given the prevalence of sexual abuse and exploitation, health professionals must address the possibility of sexual abuse or exploitation once a trusting relationship has been established. All gynaecologic and obstetric examinations must be approached sensitively, allowing the patient to determine when she feels comfortable enough to proceed. ( III-A )
- Health professionals should be aware of the increased prevalence of human immunodeficiency virus/ acquired immune deficiency syndrome (HIV/AIDS) among First Nations, Inuit, and Métis and should offer HIV counselling and screening to women who are pregnant or of childbearing age. Culturally safe approaches to HIV and other hematogenously transferred disease counselling, testing, diagnosis, and treatment should be supported and adopted. ( III-A )
- Health professionals should be aware of the high rates of cervical cancer and poorer outcomes once diagnosed for First Nations and Inuit patients. Health professionals should strive to limit the disparity between their Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal patients by promoting culturally safe screening options. ( I-A )
- Health professionals must ensure that First Nations, Inuit, and Métis women have access to services for all their reproductive health needs, including terminations, without prejudice. Health professionals should strive to ensure confidentiality, particularly in small and fly-in communities. ( III-A )
- Health professionals should recognize pregnancy as a unique opportunity to engage with and affirm the sexual and reproductive health rights, values, and beliefs of First Nations, Inuit, and Métis women. ( III-L )
Clinical Tips |
---|
|
First Nations, Inuit, and Métis Maternal Health
Recommendation
- Health care providers should ask about, respect, and advocate for institutional protocols and policies supporting the wishes of individuals and families regarding disposal or preservation of tissues involved in conception, pregnancy, miscarriages, terminations, hysterectomy, and other procedures. ( III-A )
- Health professionals should recognize that mental illnesses such as mood disorders, anxiety, and addictions are a major public health issue for many First Nations, Inuit, and Métis. ( II-3B ) Use of mood-altering substances that lead to addiction is often a mechanism for coping with the pain of their intergenerational trauma. Health professionals should familiarize themselves with culturally safe harm reduction strategies that can be used to support First Nations, Inuit, and Métis women and their families struggling with substance dependence. ( II-2A )
- Health professionals should support and promote the return of birth to rural and remote communities for women at low risk of complications. The necessary involvement of community in decision-making around the distribution and allocation of resources for maternity care should be acknowledged and facilitated. ( III-A )
Clinical Tips |
---|
|
Mature Women’s Health
Recommendation
- Health professionals should be aware that there is a great lack of research, resources, and programming about mature women’s health issues, including menopause, that is specific to First Nations, Inuit, and Métis. Health professionals should advocate for further research in this area. ( III-A )
Changing Outcomes Through Culturally Competent Care
Summary Statements
- Research has shown that where cultural competency strategies have been implemented, health outcomes and patient satisfaction have improved. ( II-3 )
- Subtle racism may occur without conscious intent, and is therefore best defined and identified by those who experience it. ( III )
Recommendations
- Health professionals should seek guidance about culturally specific communication practices and should tailor communications to the specific situations and histories of their patients. ( III-A )
- Health professionals may express to their patients that they wish to establish a respectful rapport through listening, acknowledging differences, and encouraging feedback. ( III-L )
- First Nations, Inuit, and Métis should receive care in their own language, where possible. Health care programs and institutions providing service to significant numbers of First Nations, Inuit, and Métis should have interpreters and First Nations, Inuit, and Métis health advocates on staff. ( III-A )
Clinical Tips |
---|
|
Definitions:
Quality of Evidence Assessment*
I : Evidence obtained from at least one properly randomized controlled trial
II-1 : Evidence from well-designed controlled trials without randomization
II-2 : Evidence from well-designed cohort (prospective or retrospective) or case-control studies, preferably from more than one centre or research group
II-3 : Evidence from comparisons between times or places with or without the intervention. Dramatic results in uncontrolled experiments (such as the results of treatment with penicillin in the 1940s) could also be included in this category
III : Opinions of respected authorities, based on clinical experience, descriptive studies, or reports of expert committees
- Adapted from the Evaluation of Evidence criteria described in the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care.
Classification of Recommendations†
A . There is good evidence to recommend the clinical preventive action.
B . There is fair evidence to recommend the clinical preventive action.
C . The existing evidence is conflicting and does not allow to make a recommendation for or against use of the clinical preventive action; however, other factors may influence decision-making.
D . There is fair evidence to recommend against the clinical preventive action.
E . There is good evidence to recommend against the clinical preventive action.
L . There is insufficient evidence (in quantity or quality) to make a recommendation; however, other factors may influence decision-making.
† Adapted from the Classification of Recommendations criteria described in the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care.
Clinical Algorithm(s)
None provided
Scope
Disease/Condition(s)
Health and well-being of First Nations, Inuit, and Métis women in Canada, with focus on:
- Sexual and reproductive health
- Maternal health
- Mature women’s health
Guideline Category
- Counseling
- Evaluation
- Management
- Prevention
- Risk Assessment
- Screening
- Treatment
Clinical Specialty
- Family Practice
- Internal Medicine
- Obstetrics and Gynecology
Intended Users
- Advanced Practice Nurses
- Allied Health Personnel
- Nurses
- Physician Assistants
- Physicians
Guideline Objective(s)
To provide health care professionals in Canada with the knowledge and tools to provide culturally safe care to First Nations, Inuit, and Métis women and through them, to their families, in order to improve the health of First Nations, Inuit, and Métis
Target Population
First Nations, Inuit, and Métis women in Canada and their families
Interventions and Practices Considered
- Health care provider education regarding definitions and demographics of First Nations, Inuit and Métis peoples
- Awareness of the social determinants of health among First Nations, Inuit, and Métis peoples
- Understanding of health systems, policies, and services for First Nations, Inuit, and Métis peoples
- Culturally appropriate management of First Nations, Inuit and Métis women’s sexual and reproductive health
- Gynaecologic and obstetric examination
- Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) counselling and screening to women who are pregnant or of childbearing age
- Culturally safe approaches to HIV and other hematogenously transferred disease counselling, testing, diagnosis, and treatment
- Culturally safe screening options for cervical cancer
- Access to services for reproductive health needs, including terminations, without prejudice
- Maternal health management * Management of substance dependence * Support and promotion of birth to rural and remote communities for women at low risk of complications
- Management of mature women’s health issues, including menopause
- Culturally competent care * Use of patient’s own language when possible * Healthcare facility provision of interpreters and First Nations, Inuit, and Métis health advocates on staff
Major Outcomes Considered
Access to and utilization of health care services and the Non-Insured Health Benefits Program
Methodology
Methods Used to Collect/Select the Evidence
- Searches of Electronic Databases
- Searches of Unpublished Data
Description of Methods Used to Collect/Select the Evidence
Published literature was retrieved through searches of PubMed, CINAHL, Sociological Abstracts, and The Cochrane Library in 2011 using appropriate controlled vocabulary (e.g., cultural competency, health services, indigenous, transcultural nursing) and key words (e.g., indigenous health services, transcultural health care, cultural safety). Targeted searches on subtopics (e.g., ceremonial rites and sexual coming of age) were also performed. The PubMed search was restricted to the years 2005 and later because of the large number of records retrieved on this topic. Searches were updated on a regular basis and incorporated in the guideline to May 2012. Grey (unpublished) literature was identified through searching the websites of selected related agencies (e.g., Campbell Collaboration, Social Care Online, Institute for Healthcare Improvement).
Number of Source Documents
Not stated
Methods Used to Assess the Quality and Strength of the Evidence
- Weighting According to a Rating Scheme (Scheme Given)
Rating Scheme for the Strength of the Evidence
Quality of Evidence Assessment*
I: Evidence obtained from at least one properly randomized controlled trial
II-1: Evidence from well-designed controlled trials without randomization
II-2: Evidence from well-designed cohort (prospective or retrospective) or case-control studies, preferably from more than one centre or research group
II-3: Evidence from comparisons between times or places with or without the intervention. Dramatic results in uncontrolled experiments (such as the results of treatment with penicillin in the 1940s) could also be included in this category
III: Opinions of respected authorities, based on clinical experience, descriptive studies, or reports of expert committees
* Adapted from the Evaluation of Evidence criteria described in the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care.
Methods Used to Analyze the Evidence
- Review of Published Meta-Analyses
- Systematic Review
Description of the Methods Used to Analyze the Evidence
Not stated
Methods Used to Formulate the Recommendations
- Expert Consensus
Description of Methods Used to Formulate the Recommendations
The quality of evidence was evaluated and recommendations were made according to guidelines developed by the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care.
Rating Scheme for the Strength of the Recommendations
Classification of Recommendations †
A. There is good evidence to recommend the clinical preventive action.
B. There is fair evidence to recommend the clinical preventive action.
C. The existing evidence is conflicting and does not allow to make a recommendation for or against use of the clinical preventive action; however, other factors may influence decision-making.
D. There is fair evidence to recommend against the clinical preventive action.
E. There is good evidence to recommend against the clinical preventive action.
L. There is insufficient evidence (in quantity or quality) to make a recommendation; however, other factors may influence decision-making.
† Adapted from the Classification of Recommendations criteria described in the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care.
Cost Analysis
A formal cost analysis was not performed and published cost analyses were not reviewed.
Method of Guideline Validation
- Internal Peer Review
Description of Method of Guideline Validation
The consensus guideline document has been prepared by the Aboriginal Health Initiative Committee and approved by the Executive and Council of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada.
Evidence Supporting the Recommendations
Type of Evidence Supporting the Recommendations
The type of supporting evidence is identified and graded for each recommendation (see the “Major Recommendations” field).
Benefits/Harms of Implementing the Guideline Recommendations
Potential Benefits
Appropriate provision of culturally safe care to First Nations, Inuit, and Métis women and through them, to their families, in order to improve the health of First Nations, Inuit, and Métis
Potential Harms
Not stated
Qualifying Statements
Qualifying Statements
This document reflects emerging clinical and scientific advances on the date issued and is subject to change. The information should not be construed as dictating an exclusive course of treatment or procedure to be followed. Local institutions can dictate amendments to these opinions. They should be well documented if modified at the local level.
Implementation of the Guideline
Description of Implementation Strategy
An implementation strategy was not provided.
Implementation Tools
- Foreign Language Translations
- Resources
Institute of Medicine (IOM) National Healthcare Quality Report Categories
IOM Care Need
- Staying Healthy
IOM Domain
- Effectiveness
- Patient-centeredness
Identifying Information and Availability
Bibliographic Source(s)
- Wilson D, de la Ronde S, Brascoupé S, Apale AN, Barney L, Guthrie B, Harrold E, Horn O, Johnson R, Rattray D, Robinson N. Health professionals working with First Nations, Inuit, and Métis consensus guideline. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2013 Jun;35(6 eSuppl):S1-52. [129 references]
Adaptation
Not applicable: The guideline was not adapted from another source.
Date Released
2013 Jun
Guideline Developer(s)
- Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada - Medical Specialty Society
Source(s) of Funding
This consensus guideline was supported by the First Nations and Inuit Health Branch, Health Canada.
Guideline Committee
Aboriginal Health Initiative Committee
Composition of Group That Authored the Guideline
Principal Authors : Don Wilson, MD, FRCSC ( Co-chair ), Heiltsuk Nation, Comox BC; Sandra de la Ronde, MD, FRCSC ( Co-chair ), Ottawa ON; Simon Brascoupé, Kitigan Zibi Anishinabeg (acting Chief Executive Officer of National Aboriginal Health Organization), Ottawa ON; Alisha Nicole Apale, MSc, Ottawa ON; Lucy Barney, RN, MSN, Lillooet Nation, Vancouver BC; Bing Guthrie, MD, FRCSC, Yellowknife NT; Elizabeth Harrold, RN, Vancouver BC; Ojistoh Horn, MD, CCFP, Mohawk, Kahnawake QC; Robin Johnson, MD, FRCSC, Esdilagh First Nation, Williams Lake BC; Darrien Rattray, MD, FRCSC, Tahltan, Halifax NS; Nicole Robinson, MA, Ottawa ON
Aboriginal Health Initiative Committee : Natsiq Alainga-Kango, Inuk, Iqaluit NU; Gisela Becker, RM, Fort Smith NT; Vyta Senikas, MD, FRCSC, MBA, Ottawa ON
Special Contributors : Annie Aningmiuq, Ottawa ON; Geri Bailey, RN, Ottawa ON; Darlene Birch, RM, Norway House MB; Katsi Cook, Aboriginal Midwife, Mohawks of Akwesasne, Washington DC; Jessica Danforth, Toronto ON; Mary Daoust, MSW, Ottawa ON; Darlene Kitty, MD, Chisasibi Cree Nation, Chissasibi QC; Jaime Koebel, BA, Métis, Ottawa ON; Judith Kornelsen, PhD, Vancouver BC; Ndakaitedzva Tsatsa Kotwas, MA, Ottawa ON; Audrey Lawrence, MA, BA, MBA, Métis, Ottawa ON; Amanda Mudry, BAFN, Cree and Haudenosaunee, Whitehorse, YT; Vyta Senikas, MD, FRCSC, MBA, Ottawa ON; Gail Theresa Turner, RN, Labrador Inuit Land Claim beneficiary, Happy Valley-Goose Bay NL; Vicki Van Wagner, RM, Toronto ON; Eduardo Vides, Ottawa ON; Fjola Hart Wasekeesikaw, RN, MN, Fisher River Cree Nation (Ochekwi-Sipi), Winnipeg MB; Sara Wolfe, RM, Toronto ON
Financial Disclosures/Conflicts of Interest
Disclosure statements have been received from all contributors.
Guideline Endorser(s)
- Aboriginal Nurses Association of Canada - Professional Association
- Canadian Association of Midwives - Professional Association
- Canadian Association of Perinatal and Women’s Health Nurses (CAPWHN) - Professional Association
- Indigenous Physicians Association of Canada - Professional Association
- Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami - International Agency
- Métis National Council - State/Local Government Agency [Non-U.S.]
- Minwaashin Lodge - Nonprofit Organization
- National Aboriginal Council of Midwives - Professional Association
- National Aboriginal Health Organization - Nonprofit Organization
- Native Youth Sexual Health Network - Nonprofit Organization
- Pauktuutit Inuit Women of Canada - Nonprofit Organization
- Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada - Medical Specialty Society
- Society of Rural Physicians of Canada - Professional Association
Guideline Status
This is the current release of the guideline.
Guideline Availability
Electronic copies: Available from the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC) Web site. Also available in French from the SOGC Web site.
Print copies: Available from the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada, La société des obstétriciens et gynécologues du Canada (SOGC) 780 promenade Echo Drive Ottawa, ON K1S 5R7 (Canada); Phone: 1-800-561-2416.
Availability of Companion Documents
A guide to avoiding re-traumatization of sexual abuse/assault victims during the birthing process is available in appendix 3 of the original guideline document.
Patient Resources
None available
NGC Status
This NGC summary was completed by ECRI Institute on September 27, 2013. The information was verified by the guideline developer on October 30, 2013.
Copyright Statement
This NGC summary is based on the original guideline, which is subject to the guideline developer’s copyright restrictions.
Disclaimer
NGC Disclaimer
The National Guideline Clearinghouse™ (NGC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the guidelines represented on this site.
All guidelines summarized by NGC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies, relevant professional associations, public or private organizations, other government agencies, health care organizations or plans, and similar entities.
Guidelines represented on the NGC Web site are submitted by guideline developers, and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NGC Inclusion Criteria.
NGC, AHRQ, and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or clinical efficacy or effectiveness of the clinical practice guidelines and related materials represented on this site. Moreover, the views and opinions of developers or authors of guidelines represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NGC, AHRQ, or its contractor ECRI Institute, and inclusion or hosting of guidelines in NGC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.
Readers with questions regarding guideline content are directed to contact the guideline developer.