Cancer chemotherapy and pregnancy.
General
Guideline Title
Cancer chemotherapy and pregnancy.
Bibliographic Source(s)
- Koren G, Carey N, Gagnon R, Maxwell C, Nulman I, Senikas V. Cancer chemotherapy and pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2013 Mar;35(3):263-78. [88 references] PubMed
Guideline Status
This is the current release of the guideline.
Recommendations
Major Recommendations
The quality of evidence (I-III) and classification of recommendations (A-L) are defined at the end of the “Major Recommendations.”
Summary Statements and Recommendations
Summary Statements
- As women are postponing child-bearing, more of them are experiencing cancer in pregnancy. (II-2)
- Chemotherapeutic agents used to combat cancer cross the placenta and may adversely affect embryogenesis by affecting cell division. (II-1)
- Exposure to such agents after the first trimester of pregnancy has not been associated with increased risk of malformations but is associated with increased risk of stillbirth, intrauterine growth restriction, and fetal toxicities. (II-2)
Recommendations
- The health care provider should examine the patient’s risk of pregnancy and desire to prevent pregnancy during chemotherapy. (I-A)
- Decisions about the best course of management in pregnancy, including timing of delivery, should balance maternal and fetal risks. Most authorities concur that maternal health and well-being must prevail. (I-A)
- Women diagnosed with cancer in pregnancy should be optimally managed by a multidisciplinary team that includes oncologists and/or hematologists (depending on the malignancy), perinatologists, family physicians, psychologists, social workers, and spiritual advisors, if sought by the family. (I-A)
Definitions:
Quality of Evidence Assessment*
I : Evidence obtained from at least one properly randomized controlled trial
II-1 : Evidence from well-designed controlled trials without randomization
II-2 : Evidence from well–designed cohort (prospective or retrospective) or case–control studies, preferably from more than one centre or research group
II-3 : Evidence obtained from comparisons between times or places with or without the intervention. Dramatic results in uncontrolled experiments (such as the results of treatment with penicillin in the 1940s) could also be included in this category.
III : Opinions of respected authorities, based on clinical experience, descriptive studies, or reports of expert committees
*Adapted from The Evaluation of Evidence criteria described in the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care.
Classification of Recommendations†
A. There is good evidence to recommend the clinical preventive action.
B. There is fair evidence to recommend the clinical preventive action.
C. The existing evidence is conflicting and does not allow to make a recommendation for or against use of the clinical preventive action; however, other factors may influence decision-making.
D. There is fair evidence to recommend against the clinical preventive action.
E. There is good evidence to recommend against the clinical preventive action.
L. There is insufficient evidence (in quantity or quality) to make a recommendation; however, other factors may influence decision-making.
†Adapted from the Classification of Recommendations criteria described in the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care.
Clinical Algorithm(s)
None provided
Scope
Disease/Condition(s)
- Cancer
- Pregnancy
Guideline Category
- Counseling
- Management
- Risk Assessment
- Treatment
Clinical Specialty
- Family Practice
- Hematology
- Internal Medicine
- Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Oncology
- Psychology
Intended Users
- Advanced Practice Nurses
- Physician Assistants
- Physicians
- Psychologists/Non-physician Behavioral Health Clinicians
- Social Workers
Guideline Objective(s)
- To promote careful education, administration, monitoring and restricted distribution when prescribing and dispensing chemotherapeutic and potentially teratogenic medications
- To develop clinical recommendations for the use of cancer chemotherapy in pregnant women and women of child-bearing age
Target Population
- Pregnant women with cancer
- Women of child-bearing age with cancer
Interventions and Practices Considered
- Evaluation of the patient’s risk of pregnancy
- Prevention of pregnancy during chemotherapy
- Management of risks of chemotherapy in pregnancy * Timing of delivery * Determination of maternal and fetal risks
- Management by a multidisciplinary team (oncologists and/or hematologists, perinatologists, family physicians, psychologists, social workers, and spiritual advisors, as indicated)
Major Outcomes Considered
- Incidence of cancer during pregnancy
- Fetal outcomes following maternal chemotherapy
- Maternal survival rates
Methodology
Methods Used to Collect/Select the Evidence
- Searches of Electronic Databases
- Searches of Unpublished Data
Description of Methods Used to Collect/Select the Evidence
Published literature was retrieved through searches of PubMed or Medline, CINAHL, and The Cochrane Library in 2011, using appropriate controlled vocabulary (e.g., antineoplastic agents, neoplasms, pregnancy) and key words (e.g., cancer, neoplasms, pregnancy, chemotherapy, antineoplastic agents). Results were restricted to systematic reviews, randomized control trials/controlled clinical trials, and observational studies. Studies were restricted to those with available English abstracts or text. Searches were updated on a regular basis and incorporated in the guideline to October 2011. Grey (unpublished) literature was identified through searching the websites of health technology assessment and health technology assessment-related agencies, clinical practice guideline collections, clinical trial registries, and from national and international medical specialty societies.
Number of Source Documents
Not stated
Methods Used to Assess the Quality and Strength of the Evidence
- Weighting According to a Rating Scheme (Scheme Given)
Rating Scheme for the Strength of the Evidence
Quality of Evidence Assessment*
I: Evidence obtained from at least one properly randomized controlled trial
II-1: Evidence from well-designed controlled trials without randomization
II-2: Evidence from well–designed cohort (prospective or retrospective) or case–control studies, preferably from more than one centre or research group
II-3: Evidence obtained from comparisons between times or places with or without the intervention. Dramatic results in uncontrolled experiments (such as the results of treatment with penicillin in the 1940s) could also be included in this category.
III: Opinions of respected authorities, based on clinical experience, descriptive studies, or reports of expert committees
*Adapted from The Evaluation of Evidence criteria described in the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care.
Methods Used to Analyze the Evidence
- Systematic Review
Description of the Methods Used to Analyze the Evidence
The quality of evidence obtained was rated using the criteria described in the Report of the Canadian Task Force on Preventative Health Care (see the “Rating Scheme for the Strength of the Evidence” field).
Methods Used to Formulate the Recommendations
- Expert Consensus
Description of Methods Used to Formulate the Recommendations
Not stated
Rating Scheme for the Strength of the Recommendations
Classification of Recommendations †
A. There is good evidence to recommend the clinical preventive action.
B. There is fair evidence to recommend the clinical preventive action.
C. The existing evidence is conflicting and does not allow to make a recommendation for or against use of the clinical preventive action; however, other factors may influence decision-making.
D. There is fair evidence to recommend against the clinical preventive action.
E. There is good evidence to recommend against the clinical preventive action.
L. There is insufficient evidence (in quantity or quality) to make a recommendation; however, other factors may influence decision-making.
†Adapted from the Classification of Recommendations criteria described in the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care.
Cost Analysis
A formal cost analysis was not performed and published cost analyses were not reviewed.
Method of Guideline Validation
- Internal Peer Review
Description of Method of Guideline Validation
This clinical practice guideline has been prepared by the Chemotherapy During Pregnancy Working Group and approved by the Executive and Council of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada.
Evidence Supporting the Recommendations
Type of Evidence Supporting the Recommendations
The type of supporting evidence is identified and graded for each recommendation (see the “Major Recommendations” field).
Benefits/Harms of Implementing the Guideline Recommendations
Potential Benefits
- Reduction of potential teratogenic/reproductive risks of exposure to antineoplastic agents
- Appropriate counseling of women of child-bearing age who are receiving chemotherapy on the risks of becoming pregnant
- Appropriate management of pregnant women who are receiving chemotherapy
Potential Harms
Not stated
Qualifying Statements
Qualifying Statements
This document reflects emerging clinical and scientific advances on the date issued and is subject to change. The information should not be construed as dictating an exclusive course of treatment or procedure to be followed. Local institutions can dictate amendments to these opinions. They should be well documented if modified at the local level. None of these contents may be reproduced in any form without prior written permission of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC).
Implementation of the Guideline
Description of Implementation Strategy
An implementation strategy was not provided.
Implementation Tools
- Foreign Language Translations
Institute of Medicine (IOM) National Healthcare Quality Report Categories
IOM Care Need
- Getting Better
- Staying Healthy
IOM Domain
- Effectiveness
- Patient-centeredness
- Safety
Identifying Information and Availability
Bibliographic Source(s)
- Koren G, Carey N, Gagnon R, Maxwell C, Nulman I, Senikas V. Cancer chemotherapy and pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2013 Mar;35(3):263-78. [88 references] PubMed
Adaptation
Not applicable: The guideline was not adapted from another source.
Date Released
2013 Mar
Guideline Developer(s)
- Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada - Medical Specialty Society
Source(s) of Funding
Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC)
Guideline Committee
The Chemotherapy During Pregnancy Working Group
Composition of Group That Authored the Guideline
Principal Authors : Gideon Koren, MD, Toronto ON; Nathalie Carey, BSc, Toronto ON; Robert Gagnon, MD, Montreal QC; Cynthia Maxwell, MD, Toronto ON; Irena Nulman, MD, Toronto ON; Vyta Senikas, MD, Ottawa ON
Financial Disclosures/Conflicts of Interest
Disclosure statements have been received from all authors.
Guideline Status
This is the current release of the guideline.
Guideline Availability
Electronic copies: Available in Portable Document Format (PDF) from the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada Web site. Also available in French from the SOGC Web site.
Print copies: Available from the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada, La société des obstétriciens et gynécologues du Canada (SOGC) 780 promenade Echo Drive Ottawa, ON K1S 5R7 (Canada); Phone: 1-800-561-2416.
Availability of Companion Documents
None available
Patient Resources
None available
NGC Status
This NGC summary was completed by ECRI Institute on May 2, 2013. The information was verified by the guideline developer on May 9, 2013.
Copyright Statement
This NGC summary is based on the original guideline, which is subject to the guideline developer’s copyright restrictions.
Disclaimer
NGC Disclaimer
The National Guideline Clearinghouse™ (NGC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the guidelines represented on this site.
All guidelines summarized by NGC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies, relevant professional associations, public or private organizations, other government agencies, health care organizations or plans, and similar entities.
Guidelines represented on the NGC Web site are submitted by guideline developers, and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NGC Inclusion Criteria.
NGC, AHRQ, and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or clinical efficacy or effectiveness of the clinical practice guidelines and related materials represented on this site. Moreover, the views and opinions of developers or authors of guidelines represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NGC, AHRQ, or its contractor ECRI Institute, and inclusion or hosting of guidelines in NGC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.
Readers with questions regarding guideline content are directed to contact the guideline developer.